On a scale from 1-5 how would you rate the lectures Day 1 before lunch (sequencing techniques, the raw data, assembly, and quality measures) in terms of providing you with the knowledge you needed to get the full learning-outcome of the remaining workshop?
Please rate the session on Day 1 after lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; KmerFinder, MLST, ResFinder, KmerResistance, PlasmidFinder, pMLST) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)
Please rate the session on Day 2 before lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; SerotypeFinder, VirulenceFinder, MyDBFinder, examining the CGE databases on BitBucket) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)
Overall, how was the level of knowledge gained during the workshop? Please rate the level of knowledge gained from 1 - 5, where 1 is very low and 5 is very high.
Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It is of essence that the hands-on time for analysing my WGS data is as short as possible, hence easy batch-upload and customisable pipelines is very important to me