Yop Poll Archive

How would you rate the level of information leading up to the workshop? Please rate from 1 - 5, where 1 is too little/missing information and 5 is high level of information





On a scale from 1-5 how would you rate the lectures Day 1 before lunch (sequencing techniques, the raw data, assembly, and quality measures) in terms of providing you with the knowledge you needed to get the full learning-outcome of the remaining workshop?





Please rate the session on Day 1 after lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; KmerFinder, MLST, ResFinder, KmerResistance, PlasmidFinder, pMLST) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the session on Day 2 before lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; SerotypeFinder, VirulenceFinder, MyDBFinder, examining the CGE databases on BitBucket) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the session on Day 2 after lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; Whole genome based phylogeny) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the session on Day 2 late afternoon (both lecture and computer exercise; Identification of unique core sequences) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the session on Day 3 before lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; Batch upload and pipelines on CGE and GoSeqIt Tools) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the session on Day 3 after lunch (both lecture and computer exercise; Metagenomics) on a scale from 1 (not useful/not relevant) to 5 (highly useful/highly relevant)





Please rate the lectures by the two guest lecturers on Day 3 on a scale from 1 to 5 (CGE and the Global Microbial Initiative + Real World Applications) in terms of putting perspectives to the knowledge gained during the workshop





Did you feel that an adequate amount of time was set aside for the computer exercises?



Were you able to get the help you needed when you needed it during the computer exercises?



Overall, how was the level of knowledge gained during the workshop? Please rate the level of knowledge gained from 1 - 5, where 1 is very low and 5 is very high.





How would you rate the location of the workshop (Rungstedgård)? Please rate the location from 1 - 5, where 1 is awful and 5 is fantastic





Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It is of essence that the hands-on time for analysing my WGS data is as short as possible, hence easy batch-upload and customisable pipelines is very important to me






Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It is of pivotal importance to me that the underlying databases of the methods are up to date






Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It is of pivotal importance to me that the data I upload is kept confidential.






Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It is very important for me to get the results of an analysis fast. To wait more than half a day is not acceptable.






Please rate how much you agree with the following statement on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (highly agree): It would be very valuable for me to be able to perform all steps and all analyses - from the raw sequencing reads and to a complete analysis - using the same platform.






Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *